Wednesday, April 28, 2021

The Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke... | Quizlet

zack April 28, 2021 No comments

Regent of Univerity of California v. Allan Bakke (1978) var en milepælag, der blev beluttet af De Forenede tater højeteret. Hovedspørgsmål: Overtrådte University of California den 14. ændringsforslag om lige beskyttelse og Civil Rights Act fra 1964 ved at udøve en bekræftende politik...The Medical School of the University of California at Davis (hereinafter Davis) had two admissions programs for the entering class of 100 students—the regular admissions program and the special admissions program. Under the regular procedure, candidates whose overall undergraduate grade...The Background of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Bakke had discovered upon researching the application of individuals who had been accepted and classified with 'minority statuses' on their respective applications, that his scores were higher.Allan Bakke, a thirty-five-year-old white man, had twice applied for admission to the University of California Medical School at Davis. There was no single majority opinion. Four of the justices contended that any racial quota system supported by government violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964.A list of BBC episodes and clips related to "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke".

REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. Allan...

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 438 U.S. 265. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. No. 7811 Argued: October 12, 1977 --- Decided: June 28, 1978. The Medical School of the University of California at Davis (hereinafter Davis)...This time Bakke sued the University of California. His position was that the school had excluded him on the basis of his race and violated his rights The trial court ruled in Bakkes favor, however they did not order the University of California to admit him. Bakke appealed to the California Supreme...Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy.At 34, Allan Bakke applied to U.C. (Davis) Medical School. Bakke had good recommendations, G.P.A., and scores on the MCAT admissions test but was rejected in 1973 and 1974. The court ordered that Bakke be admitted to The University of California.

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke - Cases - LAWS.com

The University of California, Davis Medical School reserved 16 spots out of the 100 in any given class for "disadvantaged minorities." It is important to note that in Bakke, the Court did not technically hold the special admissions program unconstitutional. J. Stevens and the three other Justices joining...at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law I. Standardized Objective Criteria Should not Form the Basis of Comparison for Majority and Minority Candidates A. Standardized tests are not reliable predictors of future academic or professional success and are culturally biased against...The Medical School of the University of California at Davis had two admissions programs, the His MCAT score was low for the regular Caucasian application but Bakke's college GPA and test scores exceeded those of the minority students admitted in the two years Bakke's applications were rejected.In 1973, the Medical School of the University of California at Davis (defendant) implemented a special admissions program intended to raise enrollment levels of minority students. Bakke (plaintiff) was a white male who applied for admission in 1973 and 1974 and was rejected both years.The California Supreme Court ordered the school, the State-run University of California, to admit Bakke. Allan Bakke filed suit after learning that minority candidates with lower qualifications had been admitted to medical school under a program that reserved spaces for ?disadvantaged? applicants.

Law School Case Brief

Rule:

In view of the transparent legislative intent, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, forty two U.S.C.S. § 2000d, must be held to proscribe best those racial classifications that will violate the Equal Protection Clause or the U.S. Const. amend. V.

Facts:

A white male who were denied admission to the clinical college at the University of California at Davis for two consecutive years, instituted an motion for declaratory and injunctive relief against the Regents of the University in the Superior Court of Yolo County, California, alleging the invalidity--under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a provision of the California Constitution, and the proscription in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (forty two USCS 2000d et seq.) against racial discrimination in any program receiving federal monetary assistance--of the clinical college's particular admissions program beneath which only disadvantaged contributors of positive minority races have been regarded as for 16 of the one hundred places in each yr's class.

Issue:

Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

Answer:

Yes.

Conclusion:

The Court affirmed the preserving that the University's special admissions program was once unlawful and the order that the respondent, Bakke, be admitted to the scientific faculty. The Court reversed that section of the judgment enjoining the University from any consideration of race in its admissions procedure. Race may well be regarded as in admissions if it was factored in with other characteristics in a aggressive procedure.

Access the full textual content case Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out for free. Be Sure You're Prepared for Class