Wednesday, April 28, 2021

Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke | Case Brief For Law...

zack April 28, 2021 No comments

The essence of the decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was that the Court upheld affirmative action. It allowed race to be considered as one of several factors in college admission policy. But establishing specific racial quotas was an approach that the Court said was not allowable.The Medical School of the University of California at Davis (hereinafter Davis) had two admissions programs for the entering class of 100 students—the regular admissions program and the special admissions program. Under the regular procedure, candidates whose overall undergraduate grade...Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy.Allan Bakke, a white male, was denied admission to the University of California Medical School. Following his second denial Bakke challenged the constitutionality of the Medical School's special admissions program claiming the program created a racial barrier to enrolment in a publicly funded...The Background of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Bakke had discovered upon researching the application of individuals who had been accepted and classified with 'minority statuses' on their respective applications, that his scores were higher.

REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, v. Allan...

In 1973, the Medical School of the University of California at Davis (defendant) implemented a special admissions program intended to raise enrollment levels of minority students. Bakke (plaintiff) was a white male who applied for admission in 1973 and 1974 and was rejected both years.Allan Bakke, a thirty-five-year-old white man, had twice applied for admission to the University of California Medical School at Davis. There was no single majority opinion. Four of the justices contended that any racial quota system supported by government violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964.Only RUB 193.34/month. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978). Bakke had good recommendations, G.P.A., and scores on the MCAT admissions test but was rejected in 1973 and 1974.The Medical School of the University of California at Davis had two admissions programs, the His MCAT score was low for the regular Caucasian application but Bakke's college GPA and test scores exceeded those of the minority students admitted in the two years Bakke's applications were rejected.

Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke - Wikipedia

A list of BBC episodes and clips related to "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke".Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964? The Court affirmed the holding that the University's special admissions program was unlawful and the order that the respondent, Bakke, be admitted to the medical school.At 34, Allan Bakke applied to U.C. (Davis) Medical School. Bakke had good recommendations, G.P.A., and scores on the MCAT admissions test but was rejected in 1973 and 1974. The court ordered that Bakke be admitted to The University of California.Key Question: Did the University of California violate the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, by practicing an affirmative action policy that resulted in the repeated rejection of Bakke's application for admission to its medical school?at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law I. Standardized Objective Criteria Should not Form the Basis of Comparison for Majority and Minority Candidates A. Standardized tests are not reliable predictors of future academic or professional success and are culturally biased against...

Law School Case Brief

Rule:

In view of the transparent legislative intent, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000d, must be held to proscribe most effective the ones racial classifications that will violate the Equal Protection Clause or the U.S. Const. amend. V.

Facts:

A white male who have been denied admission to the medical college at the University of California at Davis for two consecutive years, instituted an action for declaratory and injunctive aid against the Regents of the University in the Superior Court of Yolo County, California, alleging the invalidity--under the equivalent coverage clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a provision of the California Constitution, and the proscription in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USCS 2000d et seq.) in opposition to racial discrimination in any program receiving federal financial assistance--of the medical faculty's special admissions program below which handiest disadvantaged individuals of certain minority races were thought to be for 16 of the 100 places in every yr's magnificence.

Issue:

Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equivalent protection clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

Answer:

Yes.

Conclusion:

The Court affirmed the preserving that the University's special admissions program was once unlawful and the order that the respondent, Bakke, be admitted to the medical college. The Court reversed that phase of the judgment enjoining the University from any attention of race in its admissions procedure. Race could be regarded as in admissions if it was factored in with other characteristics in a competitive procedure.

Access the full text case Not a Lexis+ subscriber? Try it out free of charge. Be Sure You're Prepared for Class